Lisa Svanfeldt-WinterPostdoc
About me
I am a postdoctoral researcher in modern history, with a particular interest in the history of knowledge and gender history.
In my current project, I study a debate on the shape of Earth in 19th century Britain. I am interested in how the debaters tried to convince their audience, often by highlighting seemingly the same scientific ideals, and how the debate could continue even after joint experiments had confirmed the stance of the scholars and professionals. The project is funded by Anna Ahlströms och Ellen Terserus stiftelse and runs from January 2021 to December 2022. The first year, 2021, I am a visiting research fellow at the Centre for the History of Science, Technology and Medicine at King’s College in London.
For my doctoral dissertation, Where Scholars are Made (2019), I studied how young folklorists acted in order to gain recognition as good scholars in their field in early 20th century Finland. I argued that a folklorist’s persona was formed in a variety of academic contexts, often beyond university walls. Different contexts formed different dimensions of the scholars’ persona, and the practices in each context carried their own gendered implications.
After receiving my PhD, I have worked in an anthology project on letters as sources in the study of emotions in academia, and a smaller project on female scholars’ international travel and connections. I have also taught on courses in modern history and supervised bachelor theses in gender history and history of knowledge.
Research projects
Publications
A selection from Stockholm University publication database
-
Where Scholars are Made
2019. Lisa Svanfeldt-Winter (et al.).
Thesis (Doc)This dissertation investigates how two Finnish folklorists, Elsa Enäjärvi (1901–1951) and Martti Haavio (1899–1973), obtained information about perceptions of what constituted good and acknowledged scholars and how they responded to these implicit and explicit expectations and requirements. The dissertation uses the concept of scholarly persona as an analytical tool to identify notions of good scholars as well as Enäjärvi’s and Haavio’s processes to form themselves as such. The analysis is based on a deep reading of private and public documents, with an emphasis on Enäjärvi’s and Haavio’s diaries and private letters to each other and friends in academia.
The dissertation’s timeframe, 1918–1932, covers Enäjärvi’s and Haavio’s earliest years at university, from attending university to obtaining doctoral degrees. Being new to the academic community meant that these two young folklorists were in acute need of information regarding expectations and requirements in their discipline. Reflecting over observations of other scholars and sharing these observations with peers were important means of forming oneself as a scholar. This formation process was often articulated by making normative descriptions of the personal qualities, behaviour and research of other academics. By describing what was desirable, acceptable or inept in scholars, Enäjärvi and Haavio established what they themselves were like as scholars. The analysis also shows that the early phase of scholarly persona formation included informal rites of passage that integrated the students deeper into the academic community. The letters to friends offered a forum to make and test these formative descriptions and to reflect upon and give meaning to these rites of passage.
The dissertation makes a systematic analysis of six arenas of Enäjärvi’s and Haavio’s academic life, where scholarly personae were formed: the university, the capital Helsinki, fieldwork, the transnational exchange with Estonian academics, international scholarly communities in Western Europe, and the scholarly home. The analysis shows that these arenas activated different dimensions of the folklorists’ persona. Moreover, the analysis shows that the different arenas activated different gendered practices and expectations of scholars and academic life.
-
Writing a folklorist’s persona in the field
2018. Lisa Svanfeldt-Winter.
ArticleIn this article, I approach negotiations of belonging by studying the relationship between folklorists and their informants. I examine how young Finnish folklorists on their first collection journeys in the early 1920s positioned themselves as scholars by stressing both their identification with and their differences from the informants. The discipline's high status as a "national science" required the collectors to approach the locals as carriers of a national heritage shared between the collectors and informants. On the other hand, the pursuit of scholarly acknowledgement urged the scholars to emphasize their position as experts who could evaluate the authenticity and academic relevance of the information offered by the locals. One effective way to do so was to highlight a temporal distance between the describer and the described, placing the informants in an earlier time of lower social and cultural development than the scholar. I discuss how the alternation between identification and difference can be interpreted as a means for the scholars to negotiate their places in their academic community and to form feasible scholarly personas within it. The article places special focus on how the young collectors performed this negotiation by describing informants in their correspondences with student friends and cooperating to find shared ways of approaching the informants in acceptable ways according to their discipline.
-
Kansakouluun sopimattomiksi katsotut oppilaat Turussa 1921–1939
2016. Lisa Svanfeldt-Winter. Ennen ja Nyt (3)
Article
Show all publications by Lisa Svanfeldt-Winter at Stockholm University
$presentationText