A selection from Stockholm University publication database

• Structural Change and the Kaldor Facts in a Growth Model With Relative Price Effects and Non-Gorman Preferences

  2014. Timo Boppart. Econometrica 82 (6), 2167-2196

  Article

  U.S. data reveal three facts: (1) the share of goods in total expenditure declines at a constant rate over time, (2) the price of goods relative to services declines at a constant rate over time, and (3) poor households spend a larger fraction of their budget on goods than do rich households. I provide a macroeconomic model with non-Gorman preferences that rationalizes these facts, along with the aggregate Kaldor facts. The model is parsimonious and admits an analytical solution. Its functional form allows a decomposition of U.S. structural change into an income and substitution effect. Estimates from micro data show each of these effects to be of roughly equal importance.

  Read more about Structural Change and the Kaldor Facts in a Growth Model With Relative Price Effects and Non-Gorman Preferences

• Missing Growth from Creative Destruction

  2019. Philippe Aghion (et al.). The American Economic Review 109 (8), 2795-2822

  Article

  For exiting products, statistical agencies often impute inflation from surviving products. This understates growth if creatively-destroyed products improve more than surviving ones. If so, then the market share of surviving products should systematically shrink. Using entering and exiting establishments to proxy for creative destruction, we estimate missing growth in US Census data on non farm businesses from 1983 to 2013. We find missing growth (i) equaled about one-half a percentage point per year; (ii) arose mostly from hotels and restaurants rather than manufacturing; and (iii) did not accelerate much after 2005, and therefore does not explain the sharp slowdown in growth since then.

  Read more about Missing Growth from Creative Destruction

• Labor Supply in the Past, Present, and Future

  2020. Timo Boppart, Per Krusell. Journal of Political Economy 128 (1), 118-157

  Article

  The absence of a trend in hours worked in the postwar United States is an exception: across countries and historically, hours fall steadily by a little below 0.5% per year. Are steadily falling hours consistent with a stable utility function over consumption and leisure under balanced growth of the macroeconomic aggregates? Yes. We fully characterize the class of such functions and thus generalize the well-known “balanced-growth preferences” that demand constant (as opposed to falling) long-run hours. Key to falling hours is an income effect (of steady productivity growth on hours) that slightly outweighs the substitution effect.

  Read more about Labor Supply in the Past, Present, and Future

Show all publications by Timo Boppart at Stockholm University