Stockholms universitet
This page in English

Olof BlomqvistForskare

Om mig

Jag antogs som doktorand vid institutionen våren 2016. Mitt huvudsakliga forskningsintresse kretsar kring den tidigmoderna statsbyggnadsprocessen i bred bemärkelse och i synnerhet föreställningar om nationell och riksidentitet. Vid sidan om forskningen utvecklar jag brädspel på historiska teman.

Forskning

I mitt avhandlingsprojekt studerar jag hur tidigmoderna föreställningar om tillhörighet och integration tog sig uttryck i mötet mellan krigsfångar och lokalbefolkning under det Stora Nordiska kriget (1700-1721). Behandlingen av krigsfångar har genom historien alltid varit nära kopplad till samtida föreställningar om, bl.a., krig, moral och lojalitet. Krigsfångenskap fungerar därför som en prisma genom vilken det är möjligt att studera samhälleliga normer och hur de förändras.

I studien jämför jag tre städer i Sverige, Danmark och kurfurstendömet Sachsen som tvangs ta emot fångar under krigets gång. Med utgångspunkt i domstolsprotokoll, kyrkoböcker och myndighetsmaterial undersöker jag hur olika lokalsamhällen hanterade närvaron av stora mängder främlingar. Genom att studera uttryck för så väl konflikter som samförstånd vill jag undersöka hur man drog gränser mellan fångar och civilister – och vad som krävdes av den enskilde fången för att passera över dem.

Publikationer

I urval från Stockholms universitets publikationsdatabas

  • Migrant, officer och fosterlandsförädrare

    2018. Olof Blomqvist. Historisk Tidskrift (S) (3), 391-420

    Artikel

    Migrant, officer and traitor to the motherland: the death sentence against Fredrich Sahlgård and perceptions of national belonging in Sweden during the Great Northern War

    In September 1717 a Swedish court martial accused the Danish officer Fredrich Sahlgård of treason, and during this trial defining Sahglård’s nationality was a focal question. Sahlgård had been born in Sweden, but had moved to Norway as a child and the defendant therefore claimed that he could not be considered a Swede. His judges, however, argued that Sahlgård was a Swede by birth and therefore bound by both god and nature to protect his native land. Based on this argument the court sentenced Sahlgård to death and a few days later he was shot.

    This court martial from the great northern war reveal the limitations of studying perceptions of national identity through normative sources. Student of national identity in early modern Sweden have primarily focused on what ideas of swedishness were communicated in state propaganda and elite discourse. Several authors have claimed that contemporary perceptions of loyalty were strongly centred on the person of the monarch and expressed through the politically potent term "fatherland" (sw. fädernesland). These sources, however, tell us little of how notions of nationality were applied in practice. During Sahlgård’s trial the military court defined swedishness in a way that not just ran counter to, but expressly rejected, contemporary norms. The judges disavowed the foundations of natural law, despite its status as contemporary legal dogma, and formulated an essentialist definition of nationality, based around the concept of “motherland” (sw. fosterland) – completely disregarding the royal propaganda.

    On the one hand, the case study suggests that the intense military mobilization in early 18th century Sweden had a significant impact on perceptions of national identity within the Swedish army, as the arguments of the court stands out from both contemporary Swedish and European norms defined by previous research. On the other hand, the study questions what actual role national identity played during the court martial. Sahlgård was sentenced to death for being a Swede, but notions of oaths and rank seem to have been just as important in defining bonds of loyalty as definitions of nationality – if not more so.

    Läs mer om Migrant, officer och fosterlandsförädrare

Visa alla publikationer av Olof Blomqvist vid Stockholms universitet

Redigera profilen