Olof BlomqvistPostdoktor
Om mig
Jag är forskare i tidigmodern historia och intresserar mig särskilt för om tvångsmigration, statsformering och nationell identitet.
Jag disputerade 2023 på en avhandling om krigsfångenskap under stora nordiska kriget där jag undersökte hur lokalsamhällen i Sverige, Danmark och Sachsen förhandlade sina gränser mot omvärlden i mötet med krigsfångar.
2023–2025 har jag varit anställd som postdok-forskare vid Göteborgs universitet där jag studerat flyktingmottagandet av internflyktingar i det svenska riket under stora nordiska kriget.
I juli 2025 påbörjade ett nytt forskningsprojekt vid institutionen om kyrkokollekter, humanitärt ansvar och gemenskapsformering i det svenska riket, ca. 1660–1860.
Vid sidan om forskningen designar jag brädspel och undersöker möjligheterna och begränsningarna med att använda spelmediet för att kommunicera historisk kunskap. Som ett pilotprojekt har jag konstruerat spelet Jag vill stanna, som syftar till att förmedla de centrala resultaten från mitt avhandlingsarbete på ett lättillgängligt sätt.
Publikationer
I urval från Stockholms universitets publikationsdatabas
-
Utblick Tyskland
2018. Olof Blomqvist. Historisk Tidskrift (S) (3), 526-535
Artikel -
Migrant, officer och fosterlandsförädrare
2018. Olof Blomqvist. Historisk Tidskrift (S) (3), 391-420
ArtikelMigrant, officer and traitor to the motherland: the death sentence against Fredrich Sahlgård and perceptions of national belonging in Sweden during the Great Northern War
In September 1717 a Swedish court martial accused the Danish officer Fredrich Sahlgård of treason, and during this trial defining Sahglård’s nationality was a focal question. Sahlgård had been born in Sweden, but had moved to Norway as a child and the defendant therefore claimed that he could not be considered a Swede. His judges, however, argued that Sahlgård was a Swede by birth and therefore bound by both god and nature to protect his native land. Based on this argument the court sentenced Sahlgård to death and a few days later he was shot.
This court martial from the great northern war reveal the limitations of studying perceptions of national identity through normative sources. Student of national identity in early modern Sweden have primarily focused on what ideas of swedishness were communicated in state propaganda and elite discourse. Several authors have claimed that contemporary perceptions of loyalty were strongly centred on the person of the monarch and expressed through the politically potent term "fatherland" (sw. fädernesland). These sources, however, tell us little of how notions of nationality were applied in practice. During Sahlgård’s trial the military court defined swedishness in a way that not just ran counter to, but expressly rejected, contemporary norms. The judges disavowed the foundations of natural law, despite its status as contemporary legal dogma, and formulated an essentialist definition of nationality, based around the concept of “motherland” (sw. fosterland) – completely disregarding the royal propaganda.
On the one hand, the case study suggests that the intense military mobilization in early 18th century Sweden had a significant impact on perceptions of national identity within the Swedish army, as the arguments of the court stands out from both contemporary Swedish and European norms defined by previous research. On the other hand, the study questions what actual role national identity played during the court martial. Sahlgård was sentenced to death for being a Swede, but notions of oaths and rank seem to have been just as important in defining bonds of loyalty as definitions of nationality – if not more so.
Visa alla publikationer av Olof Blomqvist vid Stockholms universitet