Milena Podolsak
About me
In my ongoing PhD project, I analyse rhetorical effects of motion metaphors in Swedish political speeches 2009–2022. The overall aim of my analysis is to explain how systematic, conceptual metaphor systems function in a specialised discourse, how communicative purposes guide the use of both conventionalised and elaborated metaphors, and how political framing is achieved. The analysis focuses on the so-called non-correspondences in the metaphorial mapping from the source domain of CONCRETE MOTION to the target domain of POLITICS. Non-correspondences are defined as lexicogrammatical, semantical and conceptual elements that cannot be explained in terms of unidirectional projection from the source to target domain. By combining Conceptual Metaphor Theory (Lakoff & Johnson 1980), Blending Theory (Fauconnier & Turner 2002) and Holistic Spatial Semantics (Zlatev et al. 2010), I seek to explore the role of such non-correspondences in the argumentative potential of metaphors.
Keywords: metaphors; motion; polysemy; Conceptual Metaphor Theory; Bleding Theory; political rhetoric; Swedish political speeches;
References
Fauconnier, Gilles & Mark Turner. 2002. The way we think. New York: Basic Books.
Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live by. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press.
Zlatev, Jordan, Johan Blomberg, and Caroline David. 2010. “Translocation, Language and the Categorization of Experience.” Pp. 389–418 in Language, cognition and Space: The state of the art and new directions. Advances in Cognitive Linguistics, edited by V. Evans and P. Chilton. London: Equinox Publishing.