I urval från Stockholms universitets publikationsdatabas

• Climate scientists as trustees in public reason: the legitimacy of political institutions amid non-epistemic values

  2025. Antoinette Scherz, Laura García-Portela. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy

  Artikel

  Addressing global challenges like climate change requires both national action and international collaboration. However, it remains unclear under what conditions international institutions, such as the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), can legitimately demand compliance from individuals and states in regulating climate change. One might assume that their legitimacy is derived from the epistemic authority of climate scientists, supporting a belief-based account of political legitimacy. However, the pervasive role of non-epistemic values in climate science challenges this view, necessitating an alternative source of legitimacy. In this paper, we argue that will-based accounts–such as democratic or public reason approaches–better reconcile the technocratic role of climate scientists with democratic decision-making in establishing the legitimacy of international climate institutions. Specifically, we contend that institutions like the UNFCCC should derive their legitimacy from the appropriate role of climate scientists as trustees, who must be held accountable through mechanisms governed by public reason.

  Läs mer om Climate scientists as trustees in public reason

• How should the EU respond to democratic backsliding? A normative assessment of expulsion and suspension of voting rights from the perspective of multilateral democracy

  2025. Antoinette Scherz. Journal of European Public Policy

  Artikel

  Democratic backsliding in member states, such as Hungary and Poland, poses a significant challenge to the European Union (EU), undermining its core values of democracy, the rule of law, and human rights. This paper addresses the fundamental normative question of how the EU should address such backsliding, by assessing the democratic justifiability of different EU responses. Drawing on the concept of multilateral democracy, the paper argues for the legitimacy and mandate of the EU to influence the domestic political institutions of its member states. It examines the normative implications of different tools, particularly the suspension of voting rights in the Council and the expulsion of backsliding states. By employing the framework of multilateral democracy, the paper offers a novel assessment of these tools, contending that this multilevel understanding reveals the suspension of voting rights as democratically preferable to the expulsion of member states.

  Läs mer om How should the EU respond to democratic backsliding? A normative assessment of expulsion and suspension of voting rights from the perspective of multilateral democracy

• Legitimate international authority and institutional diversity

  2025. Antoinette Scherz, Oisin Suttle. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy

  Artikel

  While international institutions are a frequent and increasing focus of political challenge and critique, evaluating their normative legitimacy raises novel theoretical challenges. International institutions are characterised by diversity in their institutional form, purposes, powers, and procedures, and by mutual interaction, existing in a complex institutional ecosystem and in relations of mutual dependency, cooperation and competition. Theorising their legitimate authority requires taking account of these features. In this introduction, we explain the connections between institutional diversity and legitimate international authority, motivating the project in which the papers in this special issue engage. We then introduce those papers, and highlight some common themes and points of contrast in the approaches adopted.

  Läs mer om Legitimate international authority and institutional diversity

• Applying Different Concepts and Conceptions of Legitimacy to the International Level: Service, Free Group Agents, and Autonomy

  2024. Antoinette Scherz. Moral Philosophy and Politics 11 (1), 63-85

  Artikel

  International institutions are facing increasing criticism of the legitimacy of their authority. But what does it mean for an international institution to be legitimate? Arthur Applbaum’s latest book provides a convincing new concept of legitimacy, namely, the power-liability view, and a new normative conception, the free group agent account. However, it is not clear how they can be applied to the international level. First, this paper examines how different concepts of legitimacy can be applied to international institutions. Second, it assesses three different conceptions of legitimacy, namely, the service conception, Applbaum’s free group agent account and the autonomy-based conception for the international level. It outlines how on the last conception, international institutions’ legitimacy depends on three different aspects required to protect autonomy: the political power of the institution; its purpose; and its relation to other institutions. Finally, the paper argues that the creation of an international institution should be seen as part of relational legitimacy and that state consent plays an important role to protect the political autonomy of peoples.

  Läs mer om Applying Different Concepts and Conceptions of Legitimacy to the International Level

• How Should Personal and Political Autonomy Feature in the ECtHR’s Margin of Appreciation?

  2023. Antoinette Scherz. Jus Cogens 5 (2-3), 149-170

  Artikel

  Läs mer om How Should Personal and Political Autonomy Feature in the ECtHR’s Margin of Appreciation?

• New perspectives on the legitimacy of international institutions and power

  2023. Gordon Arlen, Antoinette Scherz, Martin Westergren. Journal of social philosophy 54 (4), 445-449

  Artikel

  In democracies around the world, political forces calling for a rollback of globalization are on the ascendancy. Longstanding consensus about the benefits of free trade and human rights and around the legitimacy of the international institutions enabling these goods has been questioned by successful populist politicians on both sides of the ideological spectrum. Some even claim that the entire liberal international order has become contested, perhaps as never before (Lake et al., 2021). An emerging critique of multilateralism argues that states and peoples should not be shackled by international legal arrangements and international law, but rather, that states should “do it alone.” The picture painted is one where state sovereignty is constrained and undermined by international institutions. This view implies that there is necessarily a tradeoff between multilateralism and state autonomy.

  Läs mer om New perspectives on the legitimacy of international institutions and power

Visa alla publikationer av Antoinette Scherz vid Stockholms universitet